Limit members to 12 years in the House and 12 in the Senate
Congressional Term Limits Constitutional Amendment
Failed passage in the House, 251–180 (two-thirds required).
Plain-language summary
This joint resolution proposed a constitutional amendment capping congressional service at 12 years per chamber, counting only terms that begin after ratification. As a constitutional amendment it required a two-thirds vote; the House vote of 251–180 fell 39 votes short, and the measure failed.
AI-generated explanation. Review the official text and official sources before drawing conclusions — summaries can omit important detail.
The strongest case on each side
Incumbents win re-election at rates above 90% largely through structural advantages, not performance, and multi-decade tenures concentrate power in seniority rather than ideas. Overwhelming public majorities across parties have supported term limits for thirty years.
Term limits fire the only people voters chose to keep, and evidence from term-limited state legislatures shows power shifting to unelected staff and lobbyists who hold the institutional memory departing members lose. Elections already provide a term limit voters control.
Both cases are presented in their strongest form. Quorly does not take a side.
What it changes — and what it doesn't
- •Would have limited service to six House terms and two Senate terms
- •Applied prospectively — only terms beginning after ratification counted
- ○Did NOT apply retroactively to sitting members' prior service
- ○Did NOT limit state legislative or executive terms
Recorded votes
Party breakdown is an estimated demonstration visual.
Timeline
- Mar 11, 2025Introduced in the House by Rep. Sam Corliss (I)
- Sep 17, 2025Discharged from Judiciary Committee by petition
- Jan 22, 2026Failed in the House, 251–180 (290 required)
Discussion
The committee calendar is the tell here. Watch whether a markup actually gets scheduled before the August recess — floor speeches are noise, markup dates are signal.
Cosponsor count has been the best single predictor in my model this cycle. Cross the ~200 mark in the House and passage odds roughly double, controlling for committee.
Worth reading the strongest-against section before taking a position — the implementation questions are where most bills like this actually stall, not the politics.
Sponsor
Community sentiment
LivePublic Pulse demonstration sample · not a scientific poll
Related forecast markets
No linked forecast markets for this bill yet.